crime+scene+script

media type="custom" key="4713685"My name is Detective Lutz. Two weeks ago I was called to a crime scene in a one bathroom two bedroom apartment at 2:00. The alleged victim was he was Felix Navad he did not have much love from his parent he droped out of collage and was not well liked. The suspect guilty of committing this crime is Vera and Alfrado and they both want his money from his will they were included in. This suspect's guilt was confirmed through the testing and results of evidence collected at the crime scene.

The most incriminating piece of evidence was the note. The evidence was found on the pattio in square 8. The test performed was handwriting analisis. The results of the test were whatit said and it said Dear Martha i'm glad it's over Feilix is dead I'll be rich soon. This connects the suspect to the crime because it said love Vera and was found at the crime scene. (It was found that it was written by Kendra.)

The next piece of evidence collected was the coke. It was found it was found in two places one is right next to the body and about one foot away from the body. The test performed was fingerprint test. The results of the test were that on the cup by the bodyhade Felix's fingerprints and the other cup had Alfrado's. This connects the suspect to the crime because Alfrado was sitting with him on the pattio and went to the bathroom came back and he was dead. (The only thing this proves is that Alfredo was having a drink with Felix.)

Another piece of evidence collected was fake blood. It was found on Vera's and Kendra's shoes. The test performed was powder test. The results of the test were (that Vera and Kendra had fake blood on their shoes. This connects the suspect to the crime because they said Alfado cut his hand and it was bleeding but they must have been lying. (The blood was found to be fake.)

The last piece of evidence collected was rag. It was found in the garbage can with colong and a dove wraper. The test performed was smell test. The results of the test were that the smell on the rag was Gene's colong. This connects the suspect to the crime because it was a persons colong that was in the house. (You are trying to prove Alfredo's guilt...not Gene's guilt.)

According to the evidence, the following is an account of the events believed to have gone down on that fateful day. All of the guests came kendra went for a walk vera was takeing a shower gene took a nap with his dog and Alfrado was with Felix he went to the bathroom came back Fekix was dead so he called all the others. (When did they commit the crime?)

Therefore, Vera Cruz committed the crime of killing Felix Navad for money (What about Alfredo?) **Rubric for Podcasts** introduction. Provides relevant information and establishes a clear purpose engaging the listener immediately. || **__Describes the topic and engages the audience as the introduction proceeds.__** || Somewhat engaging (covers well-known topic), and provides a vague purpose. || Irrelevant or inappropriate topic that minimally engages listener. Does not include an introduction or the purpose is vague and unclear. ||^  || Beginning pace was too fast and some words were hard to understand || Enunciation, expression, rhythm are sometimes distracting during the podcast. || Enunciation of spoken word is distant and muddled and not clear. Expression and rhythm are distracting throughout the podcast. ||^  || 70% ||
 * ** CATEGORY ** || ** Exemplary **  || ** Proficient **  || ** Partially Proficient **  || ** Incomplete **  || ** POINTS **  ||
 * ** Introduction ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Catchy and clever
 * ^  || **__Tells who is speaking, date the podcast was produced, and where the speaker is located.__**  || Tells most of the following: who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Alludes to who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Speaker is not identified. No production date or location of the speaker is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Content ** || ** 6 points ** || ** 4 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || The motive was detailed and clearly based on information delivered throughout the investigation.  || **__ The motive is detailed and based on partial information delivered throughout the investigation.  __** || The motive is not very detailed and is sprinkled with inaccurate information.  || The motive is missing, or unclear or all information is inaccurate.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Four pieces of strong evidence were presented and linked to the suspect in an organized, methodical manner.  || Three or four pieces of evidence were presented and/or linked to the suspect in a somewhat organized, thoughtful manner.  || __**Two pieces of shaky evidence were presented and/or loosely linked to the suspect. Lack of organization.**__  || One to no pieces of unimportant evidence were presented in an unorganized manner.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || The events in the scenario are detailed, extremely organized and strongly supported with evidence and facts related to the crime scene.  || The events in the scenario are well organized, somewhat detailed, and supported with evidence from the crime scene. || __** The events in the crime scene lack organization, detail, and are weakly supported with evidence from the crime scene. **__ || There was no clear direction and evidence was unimportant. ||^   ||
 * ^  || Conclusion clearly summarizes key information.  || Conclusion summarizes information.  || __**Conclusion vaguely summarizes key information**__  || No conclusion is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Delivery ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 point ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Well rehearsed, smooth delivery in a conversational style.  || **__Rehearsed, smooth delivery.__**  || Appears unrehearsed with uneven delivery.  || Delivery is hesitant, and choppy and sounds like the presenter is reading.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Highly effective enunciation and presenter's speech is clear and intelligible, not distant and muddled. Expression, and rhythm keep the audience listening. || **__Enunciation, expression, pacing are effective throughout the podcast.__**
 * ^  || **__Correct grammar is used throughout the podcast.__**  || Correct grammar is used during most of the podcast.  || Occasionally incorrect grammar is used during the podcast.  || Poor grammar is used throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ** Graphic and Music Enhancements ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__Music enhances the mood, quality, and understanding of the presentation.__**  || Music provides supportive background to the podcast.  || Music provides somewhat distracting background to the podcast.  || Music is distracting to presentation.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__All music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared with appropriate documentation.__**  || Music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared.  || Use of copyrighted works is questionable.  || Copyright infringement is obvious.  ||^   ||
 * ** Technical Production ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment without background noise and distractions.__**  || Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment with minimal background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a semi-quiet environment with some background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a noisy environment with constant background noise and distractions.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Transitions are smooth and spaced correctly without noisy, dead space.__**  || Transitions are smooth with a minimal amount of ambient noise.  || Transitions are uneven with inconsistent spacing; ambient noise is present.  || Transitions are abrupt and background noise needs to be filtered.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Volume of voice, music, and effects enhance the presentation.__**  || Volume is acceptable.  || Volume is occasionally inconsistent.  || Volume changes are highly distracting.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__ Podcast length keeps the audience interested and engaged.  __** || Podcast length keeps audience listening.  || Podcast length is somewhat long or somewhat short to keep audience engaged.  || Podcast is either too long or too short to keep the audience engaged.  ||^   ||
 * ** TOTAL POINTS ** || 40/57